<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for cigarettes and coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timofejew.ca/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timofejew.ca</link>
	<description>Quit giving me that dirty look...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:44:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by josh</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-418</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-418</guid>
		<description>dude your lucky as hell... mine is still downloading on 1% and ive been waiting 30 minutes. and its not coz i have shitty connection coz i usually download things extremely quick but 4 some reason this is takin ages</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude your lucky as hell&#8230; mine is still downloading on 1% and ive been waiting 30 minutes. and its not coz i have shitty connection coz i usually download things extremely quick but 4 some reason this is takin ages</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Font Rendering (or: Screw Windows) by David Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/font-rendering-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=602#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Damn Right You Are Sir!

    I too developed a site just for my personal use and enjoyment. I hand crafted the css and tailored the design using the traditional core fonts of Georgia and Times New Roman. My desktop of choice is KDE using each of Firefox, Opera and Konqueror (and Lynx for text veiw) to validate the site design and layout. I do have windows boxes available, but with the maturity of virtualization (vmware or virtualbox), I rarely boot into windows at all.

    To my great dismay, after spending a great deal of time and considering the site layout complete, I happened to be using vista and looked at my site -- it looked like crap in vista.

    WTF??

    Microsoft Vista can&#039;t even render Microsoft fonts correctly?? The irony is thick and the utter incompetence inexcuseable. So I commend your site and echo your sentiments exactly &quot;So… fuck it. If this site looks a bit sub-standard on Windows, just because I happened to want to use, oh, a serif font, that’s too bad.&quot;

    And... I have the cure... Screw windows and load Linux (I&#039;d recommend openSuSE for beginners or Arch Linux for the more daring) or buy a Mac. There you have it... Problem Solved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn Right You Are Sir!</p>
<p>    I too developed a site just for my personal use and enjoyment. I hand crafted the css and tailored the design using the traditional core fonts of Georgia and Times New Roman. My desktop of choice is KDE using each of Firefox, Opera and Konqueror (and Lynx for text veiw) to validate the site design and layout. I do have windows boxes available, but with the maturity of virtualization (vmware or virtualbox), I rarely boot into windows at all.</p>
<p>    To my great dismay, after spending a great deal of time and considering the site layout complete, I happened to be using vista and looked at my site &#8212; it looked like crap in vista.</p>
<p>    WTF??</p>
<p>    Microsoft Vista can&#8217;t even render Microsoft fonts correctly?? The irony is thick and the utter incompetence inexcuseable. So I commend your site and echo your sentiments exactly &#8220;So… fuck it. If this site looks a bit sub-standard on Windows, just because I happened to want to use, oh, a serif font, that’s too bad.&#8221;</p>
<p>    And&#8230; I have the cure&#8230; Screw windows and load Linux (I&#8217;d recommend openSuSE for beginners or Arch Linux for the more daring) or buy a Mac. There you have it&#8230; Problem Solved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom Error Pages with iWeb by John Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2006/custom-error-pages-with-iweb/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=188#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Great article, many thanks indeed. I already knew about .htaccess and managed to get a 404 page for my site in iWeb, but as you say the files for the 404 page weren&#039;t working. I can&#039;t thank you enough for this information as everything works exactly as I want it to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, many thanks indeed. I already knew about .htaccess and managed to get a 404 page for my site in iWeb, but as you say the files for the 404 page weren&#8217;t working. I can&#8217;t thank you enough for this information as everything works exactly as I want it to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Site update: progress report by Envy</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/site-update-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Envy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=327#comment-147</guid>
		<description>thanks !!  very helpful post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks !!  very helpful post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Font Rendering (or: Screw Windows) by James</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/font-rendering-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=602#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Most new Windows installs have cleartype turned on by default.  Mac users will still find Windows font rendering uncomfortable because Windows hints more strongly than Mac OS X does, but that may just me what you are comfortable with.  Windows users often consider Mac OS X fonts too fuzzy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most new Windows installs have cleartype turned on by default.  Mac users will still find Windows font rendering uncomfortable because Windows hints more strongly than Mac OS X does, but that may just me what you are comfortable with.  Windows users often consider Mac OS X fonts too fuzzy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom Error Pages with iWeb by Richard Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2006/custom-error-pages-with-iweb/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=188#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Your field did not allow: &quot;but do I name it dot htaccess or forward slash dot htaccess?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your field did not allow: &#8220;but do I name it dot htaccess or forward slash dot htaccess?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom Error Pages with iWeb by Richard Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2006/custom-error-pages-with-iweb/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=188#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I do truly appreciate your article here, but as a guidebook writer by profession, to be understood by my readers I must assume that nobody knows anything, as my starting point.

I can indeed create a folder in my root directory, but do I name it  or ?

How do I actually get these html code things in there? Do I copy and paste from your webpage into a word program, or...?
of us who use iWeb EXACTLY because we don&#039;t have html-wired brains?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do truly appreciate your article here, but as a guidebook writer by profession, to be understood by my readers I must assume that nobody knows anything, as my starting point.</p>
<p>I can indeed create a folder in my root directory, but do I name it  or ?</p>
<p>How do I actually get these html code things in there? Do I copy and paste from your webpage into a word program, or&#8230;?<br />
of us who use iWeb EXACTLY because we don&#8217;t have html-wired brains?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Font Rendering (or: Screw Windows) by Benny</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/font-rendering-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Benny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=602#comment-56</guid>
		<description>From the screenshot above, it seems that the Windows machine that that it was taken on does not have ClearType turned on. I&#039;ve posted some info on how to turn it on here: http://notebook.bwong.net/2007/07/16/turn-jagged-letters-smoooove/

That said, even with ClearType turned on, it&#039;s definite still far from acceptable...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the screenshot above, it seems that the Windows machine that that it was taken on does not have ClearType turned on. I&#8217;ve posted some info on how to turn it on here: <a href="http://notebook.bwong.net/2007/07/16/turn-jagged-letters-smoooove/" rel="nofollow">http://notebook.bwong.net/2007/07/16/turn-jagged-letters-smoooove/</a></p>
<p>That said, even with ClearType turned on, it&#8217;s definite still far from acceptable&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. by No one of any significance</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/shoulder-of-orion/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>No one of any significance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1110#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Also, I can show you some interesting shiv making techniques with cigarette butts if chicken bones aren&#039;t your style. Don&#039;t ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I can show you some interesting shiv making techniques with cigarette butts if chicken bones aren&#8217;t your style. Don&#8217;t ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. by No one of any significance</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/shoulder-of-orion/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>No one of any significance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1110#comment-52</guid>
		<description>In an insomniac fit of insanity - I mean, late night blog reading - I saw this and thought you might appreciate. Or maybe not. I&#039;ll let you decide. http://toddalcott.livejournal.com/227310.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an insomniac fit of insanity &#8211; I mean, late night blog reading &#8211; I saw this and thought you might appreciate. Or maybe not. I&#8217;ll let you decide. <a href="http://toddalcott.livejournal.com/227310.html" rel="nofollow">http://toddalcott.livejournal.com/227310.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. by Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/shoulder-of-orion/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1110#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Firstly, and most importantly, I love Blade Runner. It&#039;s my favorite movie.

Things are definitely at a virtually unparalleled low. I live in Dearborn Heights, Michigan, which is an inner-ring Detroit suburb, and we&#039;re feeling the hurt badly. Detroit has an unbelievably extensive dependence on the American automotive industry. Obviously, things for the U.S. automotive companies have not been good, and the hurt has been abroad. We have the highest unemployment rate of any state in the US. The only area that has eclipsed use in unemployment are Hurricane Katrina disaster zones.

Things are different in Toronto, I&#039;m sure, but not as different as they may seem. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but the Royal Bank of Canada, the Bank of Montréal, Scotiabank, and Toronto-Dominion are all run out of Toronto. Toronto has a large dependence on the finance industry, and it&#039;s hard to avoid the presence of investment in these banks by U.S. companies, what with the two economies being so closely tied. It&#039;s no wonder the US financial crisis is affecting Canada so badly.

However, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite time to get out the chicken bones. There&#039;s still hope that something can be done, although I can&#039;t imagine how to wade through the political soup of dilettantes, inept cowards, and competing interests that can&#039;t come to a conclusion because they&#039;re too busy bickering about pedantic garbage to move something through that will help solidify the world economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, and most importantly, I love Blade Runner. It&#8217;s my favorite movie.</p>
<p>Things are definitely at a virtually unparalleled low. I live in Dearborn Heights, Michigan, which is an inner-ring Detroit suburb, and we&#8217;re feeling the hurt badly. Detroit has an unbelievably extensive dependence on the American automotive industry. Obviously, things for the U.S. automotive companies have not been good, and the hurt has been abroad. We have the highest unemployment rate of any state in the US. The only area that has eclipsed use in unemployment are Hurricane Katrina disaster zones.</p>
<p>Things are different in Toronto, I&#8217;m sure, but not as different as they may seem. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but the Royal Bank of Canada, the Bank of Montréal, Scotiabank, and Toronto-Dominion are all run out of Toronto. Toronto has a large dependence on the finance industry, and it&#8217;s hard to avoid the presence of investment in these banks by U.S. companies, what with the two economies being so closely tied. It&#8217;s no wonder the US financial crisis is affecting Canada so badly.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite time to get out the chicken bones. There&#8217;s still hope that something can be done, although I can&#8217;t imagine how to wade through the political soup of dilettantes, inept cowards, and competing interests that can&#8217;t come to a conclusion because they&#8217;re too busy bickering about pedantic garbage to move something through that will help solidify the world economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-47</guid>
		<description>my itunes8 download is taking 3 hours.....god damn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my itunes8 download is taking 3 hours&#8230;..god damn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breaking a sacred rule by Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/breaking-a-sacred-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=992#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Re-sampling is the best noise filter of them all. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-sampling is the best noise filter of them all. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-38</guid>
		<description>The amount of suspense that surrounds an Apple announcement is beyond ridiculous. It was interesting about 5 years ago when Apple was churning out innovative, new things with every announcement, but now it just seems like more of the same. Apple has their assault on San Franciscan conference centers, sold out to the press, only to announce new colors for the iPod nano or an over-glorified iTunes update.

I personally, I couldn&#039;t care less for having a phone with a bunch of whiz-bang features like a web browser and a bunch of pointless applications (See: I Am Rich) for download, so events like these don&#039;t mean much to me. But they also give Apple&#039;s events all around less significance. What&#039;s exciting is the imminence of new Apple computer products, or expansion into new technological sectors.

What I think I&#039;m trying to say is that the iPod is old and quite frankly boring. It&#039;s really difficult to get excited over the fifteenth re-hash of the same basic product idea. It&#039;s easy to get excited about a new Apple computer, like the MacBook Air (despite it being a bit of a disappointment) since Apple only really sells six different computers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amount of suspense that surrounds an Apple announcement is beyond ridiculous. It was interesting about 5 years ago when Apple was churning out innovative, new things with every announcement, but now it just seems like more of the same. Apple has their assault on San Franciscan conference centers, sold out to the press, only to announce new colors for the iPod nano or an over-glorified iTunes update.</p>
<p>I personally, I couldn&#8217;t care less for having a phone with a bunch of whiz-bang features like a web browser and a bunch of pointless applications (See: I Am Rich) for download, so events like these don&#8217;t mean much to me. But they also give Apple&#8217;s events all around less significance. What&#8217;s exciting is the imminence of new Apple computer products, or expansion into new technological sectors.</p>
<p>What I think I&#8217;m trying to say is that the iPod is old and quite frankly boring. It&#8217;s really difficult to get excited over the fifteenth re-hash of the same basic product idea. It&#8217;s easy to get excited about a new Apple computer, like the MacBook Air (despite it being a bit of a disappointment) since Apple only really sells six different computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by no one in particular</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>no one in particular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 16:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I know where the Disc Utility is :P Give me a *little* credit! I ran it and this is what I found:

permissions differ on &quot;private/var/log/secure.log&quot;, should be -rw------- , they are -rw-r----- .
Permissions differ on &quot;System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.usbmuxd.plist&quot;, should be -rw-r--r-- , they are -rwxr-xr-x .
Group differs on &quot;private/etc/cups&quot;, should be 0, group is 26.

Anyway, when I took this beast to the Genius Bar initially, I was told all my troubles that I was having had to do with the fact that I had about 4GB of free space, which would be fine except for the fact that I am running File Vault. I was urged to get an external drive, clear out the clutter and turn off the program. Not so simple, but I&#039;ll not get into that. The reason I mention this, is that I suspect this is the same kind of issue. It&#039;s much lesser version of the same weirdness I had before my adventures in external hard drives and computer illiteracy... So, checking through everything, my actual mp3&#039;s are all fine, it&#039;s just the communication between iTunes and my hard drive that is getting muddled (small miracles)... And it was just playing with the &quot;Genius&quot; option to see if iTunes could really make cohesive playlists. Before crashing, I learned that it isn&#039;t that amazing but still better than random. Oh yes, and upgrading QuickTime (but that might have just been a coincidence). 

Backups are good and I do one every week or so... There is very little that gets added on in between time that is so valuable to me... Now, if I had as massive an mp3, video and photo collection as you, it might be a different story! Also, I am happy to see that you are still alive and thanks for your input! I hope all is well in your wasteland! 

In a slightly related theme, a song that reminded me of you just popped up on iTunes. I guess that, not only is iTunes 8 very snappy, it has done some kind of freaky mind meld and is capable of generating playlists accordingly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know where the Disc Utility is :P Give me a *little* credit! I ran it and this is what I found:</p>
<p>permissions differ on &#8220;private/var/log/secure.log&#8221;, should be -rw&#8212;&#8212;- , they are -rw-r&#8212;&#8211; .<br />
Permissions differ on &#8220;System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.usbmuxd.plist&#8221;, should be -rw-r&#8211;r&#8211; , they are -rwxr-xr-x .<br />
Group differs on &#8220;private/etc/cups&#8221;, should be 0, group is 26.</p>
<p>Anyway, when I took this beast to the Genius Bar initially, I was told all my troubles that I was having had to do with the fact that I had about 4GB of free space, which would be fine except for the fact that I am running File Vault. I was urged to get an external drive, clear out the clutter and turn off the program. Not so simple, but I&#8217;ll not get into that. The reason I mention this, is that I suspect this is the same kind of issue. It&#8217;s much lesser version of the same weirdness I had before my adventures in external hard drives and computer illiteracy&#8230; So, checking through everything, my actual mp3&#8217;s are all fine, it&#8217;s just the communication between iTunes and my hard drive that is getting muddled (small miracles)&#8230; And it was just playing with the &#8220;Genius&#8221; option to see if iTunes could really make cohesive playlists. Before crashing, I learned that it isn&#8217;t that amazing but still better than random. Oh yes, and upgrading QuickTime (but that might have just been a coincidence). </p>
<p>Backups are good and I do one every week or so&#8230; There is very little that gets added on in between time that is so valuable to me&#8230; Now, if I had as massive an mp3, video and photo collection as you, it might be a different story! Also, I am happy to see that you are still alive and thanks for your input! I hope all is well in your wasteland! </p>
<p>In a slightly related theme, a song that reminded me of you just popped up on iTunes. I guess that, not only is iTunes 8 very snappy, it has done some kind of freaky mind meld and is capable of generating playlists accordingly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by Peter Timofejew</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Timofejew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-32</guid>
		<description>That is really terrible - I&#039;d be furious as well if the update messed up my music library. Thankfully, my upgrade went well.

For what it&#039;s worth, I also have my iTunes library on an external drive, with approximately 15,000 music tracks, and around 300 or so video files. More precisely, the media files are on an external drive on a server in my closet, and my main workstation mounts that drive over the network (so it&#039;s sort of external, once removed I guess). However, my iTunes library files are on the workstation&#039;s hard drive, and that&#039;s what stores all the pointers to the actual media files. I&#039;m going to guess that when iTunes crashed on you, the library files are what got messed up. And yeah - it&#039;d be a royal pain to figure out what&#039;s missing (along with losing various meta data about the media such as number of times played, ratings, etc.)

Unless you have the library files backed up, there&#039;s not much you can do about recovering it short of manually fixing up the problems. That said, it really shouldn&#039;t have happened in the first place - in fact, I can&#039;t remember the last time iTunes crashed on me. Maybe your disk drive needs some structural repair? Try running &#039;Disk Utility&#039; in the &#039;Applications-&gt;Utilities&#039; folder. Select &#039;Verify Disk&#039; on your internal hard drive, then run &#039;Repair Permissions&#039; and see if that helps things. If you get some weird messages, it&#039;s best to make an appointment with a &#039;Genius&#039; at the Apple Store and have them take a look at your machine.

And I won&#039;t mention anything about making regular backups. Ooops. I just did... If it makes you feel any better, take a gander at my tale of &quot;I don&#039;t need no stinking backups&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;/2006/hard-drive-failure/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is really terrible &#8211; I&#8217;d be furious as well if the update messed up my music library. Thankfully, my upgrade went well.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I also have my iTunes library on an external drive, with approximately 15,000 music tracks, and around 300 or so video files. More precisely, the media files are on an external drive on a server in my closet, and my main workstation mounts that drive over the network (so it&#8217;s sort of external, once removed I guess). However, my iTunes library files are on the workstation&#8217;s hard drive, and that&#8217;s what stores all the pointers to the actual media files. I&#8217;m going to guess that when iTunes crashed on you, the library files are what got messed up. And yeah &#8211; it&#8217;d be a royal pain to figure out what&#8217;s missing (along with losing various meta data about the media such as number of times played, ratings, etc.)</p>
<p>Unless you have the library files backed up, there&#8217;s not much you can do about recovering it short of manually fixing up the problems. That said, it really shouldn&#8217;t have happened in the first place &#8211; in fact, I can&#8217;t remember the last time iTunes crashed on me. Maybe your disk drive needs some structural repair? Try running &#8216;Disk Utility&#8217; in the &#8216;Applications->Utilities&#8217; folder. Select &#8216;Verify Disk&#8217; on your internal hard drive, then run &#8216;Repair Permissions&#8217; and see if that helps things. If you get some weird messages, it&#8217;s best to make an appointment with a &#8216;Genius&#8217; at the Apple Store and have them take a look at your machine.</p>
<p>And I won&#8217;t mention anything about making regular backups. Ooops. I just did&#8230; If it makes you feel any better, take a gander at my tale of &#8220;I don&#8217;t need no stinking backups&#8221; <a href="/2006/hard-drive-failure/" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by no one in particular</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>no one in particular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 05:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Variations on a theme: updating Quicktime, upon restarting my beloved computer, all my playlists randomly were deleted from iTunes... As were a small chunk of the mp3&#039;s that I had to add back (I really don&#039;t have the patience for this!)... All related to running iTunes in my internal and my mp3&#039;s being housed in my external hard drive? Related at all or just a weird coincidence. You can be the judge. 

Any rate, I figure that I am not alone in the world and if this is happening to me, it is likely happening to others... Possibly yourself (cue ominous music here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Variations on a theme: updating Quicktime, upon restarting my beloved computer, all my playlists randomly were deleted from iTunes&#8230; As were a small chunk of the mp3&#8217;s that I had to add back (I really don&#8217;t have the patience for this!)&#8230; All related to running iTunes in my internal and my mp3&#8217;s being housed in my external hard drive? Related at all or just a weird coincidence. You can be the judge. </p>
<p>Any rate, I figure that I am not alone in the world and if this is happening to me, it is likely happening to others&#8230; Possibly yourself (cue ominous music here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why did iTunes take so long to download? by no one in particular</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/itunes-took-a-while-to-download/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>no one in particular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=1098#comment-29</guid>
		<description>The genius thing royally fuct my iTunes library. It crashed iTunes twice and completely corrupted my directory (I think... you know I&#039;m completely technophobic) so I decided to just shut it off... Maybe it&#039;s best to stop poking myself in the eye instead of asking why it hurts every time I do it? Anyway, I&#039;m not sure if this is because I am running my library from an external hard drive? Anyway, I am still manually going through everything and rebuilding and it&#039;s making me cranky. Possibly an iTunes thing in general? Or maybe a peripheral thing? I dunno, but I figured you&#039;d post something about the release and you could possibly be interested. Or not. But the visualizer is a goodly amount of fun (sober or otherwise :D).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The genius thing royally fuct my iTunes library. It crashed iTunes twice and completely corrupted my directory (I think&#8230; you know I&#8217;m completely technophobic) so I decided to just shut it off&#8230; Maybe it&#8217;s best to stop poking myself in the eye instead of asking why it hurts every time I do it? Anyway, I&#8217;m not sure if this is because I am running my library from an external hard drive? Anyway, I am still manually going through everything and rebuilding and it&#8217;s making me cranky. Possibly an iTunes thing in general? Or maybe a peripheral thing? I dunno, but I figured you&#8217;d post something about the release and you could possibly be interested. Or not. But the visualizer is a goodly amount of fun (sober or otherwise :D).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breaking a sacred rule by Peter Timofejew</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/breaking-a-sacred-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Timofejew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=992#comment-23</guid>
		<description>And just to answer a question I was asked, the photos haven&#039;t been retouched, with the exception of &quot;red-eye removal&quot; from one of the shots. They are simply as the iPhone took &#039;em; no twiddling of contrast/exposure/white balance/noise/saturation, etc. But, they been resized for the page, which, of course, makes them appear sharper than they really are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just to answer a question I was asked, the photos haven&#8217;t been retouched, with the exception of &#8220;red-eye removal&#8221; from one of the shots. They are simply as the iPhone took &#8216;em; no twiddling of contrast/exposure/white balance/noise/saturation, etc. But, they been resized for the page, which, of course, makes them appear sharper than they really are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Font Rendering (or: Screw Windows) by Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/font-rendering-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=602#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Arial is actually a variant of Helvetica that&#039;s hinted to line up with the pixel grid! The (slim) handful of fonts that are accessible to web designers in Internet Explorer are mostly Microsoft&#039;s re-envisioned versions of those fonts, optimized to line up with the pixel grid. Fonts like Georgia, Arial, Trebuchet MS, Verdana, etc, are all hinted by Microsoft to look good with Windows&#039; font rendering. Because of this, many of these fonts have a reputation among designers of being bastardized rip-offs of age old fonts. Only recently has Microsoft released fonts that many typeface designers would consider worth praise, like the new default font for Microsoft Office 2007, humanist font Calibri, which is similar to Futura or Trebuchet MS. Not coincidentally, Microsoft hired a typeface designer to create Calibri. It is one in a collection of fonts that are designed for ClearType, all of which are distributed with every copy of Office 2007, Windows Vista, and the (free!) PowerPoint 2007 Viewer. In time these fonts will be common on the internet as more people adopt Windows Vista and Office 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arial is actually a variant of Helvetica that&#8217;s hinted to line up with the pixel grid! The (slim) handful of fonts that are accessible to web designers in Internet Explorer are mostly Microsoft&#8217;s re-envisioned versions of those fonts, optimized to line up with the pixel grid. Fonts like Georgia, Arial, Trebuchet MS, Verdana, etc, are all hinted by Microsoft to look good with Windows&#8217; font rendering. Because of this, many of these fonts have a reputation among designers of being bastardized rip-offs of age old fonts. Only recently has Microsoft released fonts that many typeface designers would consider worth praise, like the new default font for Microsoft Office 2007, humanist font Calibri, which is similar to Futura or Trebuchet MS. Not coincidentally, Microsoft hired a typeface designer to create Calibri. It is one in a collection of fonts that are designed for ClearType, all of which are distributed with every copy of Office 2007, Windows Vista, and the (free!) PowerPoint 2007 Viewer. In time these fonts will be common on the internet as more people adopt Windows Vista and Office 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Font Rendering (or: Screw Windows) by Peter Timofejew</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/font-rendering-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Timofejew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=602#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the explanation, Andrew!

I&#039;ve always wondered why the font rendering was so ugly with Windows. I remember reading a few years ago some information about the differences in font rendering (I think around the time that Microsoft introduced ClearType), but I didn&#039;t pay much attention to it at the time, as I rarely end up in front of a Windows machine (and when I do, I&#039;m usually overwhelmed by all the unfamiliar, shiny buttons and controls to notice the font rendering much). Earlier incarnations of this website used sans-serif fonts (like the venerable Arial), which render reasonably OK on Windows. I only really noticed how terrible it was with this version of the website, now that I dared to use serif fonts. How foolish of me...

Your summary of the technology differences makes a great deal of sense, and it also explains why fonts always seem to need to diet when seen on Windows. It will be interesting to see how Microsoft&#039;s rendering technology improves (or does not improve) as higher resolution displays become more common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the explanation, Andrew!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered why the font rendering was so ugly with Windows. I remember reading a few years ago some information about the differences in font rendering (I think around the time that Microsoft introduced ClearType), but I didn&#8217;t pay much attention to it at the time, as I rarely end up in front of a Windows machine (and when I do, I&#8217;m usually overwhelmed by all the unfamiliar, shiny buttons and controls to notice the font rendering much). Earlier incarnations of this website used sans-serif fonts (like the venerable Arial), which render reasonably OK on Windows. I only really noticed how terrible it was with this version of the website, now that I dared to use serif fonts. How foolish of me&#8230;</p>
<p>Your summary of the technology differences makes a great deal of sense, and it also explains why fonts always seem to need to diet when seen on Windows. It will be interesting to see how Microsoft&#8217;s rendering technology improves (or does not improve) as higher resolution displays become more common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Site update: progress report by Peter Timofejew</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/site-update-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Timofejew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=327#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the comment, Andrew!

I am rather liking WordPress - and the price certainly can&#039;t be beat. It&#039;s definitely not a full-blown CMS (for example, media handling is rather limited), and certainly shows it&#039;s blogging heritage, but I really like it&#039;s &quot;hackability&quot;. Some of the plugins are quite amazing. And it does seem like I could bolt pretty much anything on it. My next challenge is to figure out how to make a decent photo gallery - so far, I&#039;m not crazy about any of the gallery plugins for WordPress.

And, as you can see, there&#039;s still a lot of messing about I need to do with the CSS...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the comment, Andrew!</p>
<p>I am rather liking WordPress &#8211; and the price certainly can&#8217;t be beat. It&#8217;s definitely not a full-blown CMS (for example, media handling is rather limited), and certainly shows it&#8217;s blogging heritage, but I really like it&#8217;s &#8220;hackability&#8221;. Some of the plugins are quite amazing. And it does seem like I could bolt pretty much anything on it. My next challenge is to figure out how to make a decent photo gallery &#8211; so far, I&#8217;m not crazy about any of the gallery plugins for WordPress.</p>
<p>And, as you can see, there&#8217;s still a lot of messing about I need to do with the CSS&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Font Rendering (or: Screw Windows) by Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/font-rendering-on-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=602#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I have the same headache with my site. I&#039;m using Helvetica Neue Light for the content and Myriad Pro for the heads, both which seem to be gaining some popularity as a pre-installed Mac OS X fonts (Myriad Pro is the default typeface for most Apple logos and headings). The font virtually doesn&#039;t exist in the Windows world, so my site falls back onto Helvetica for body text and Verdana for heading text. That configuration actually looks pretty decent on Mac OS X. On Windows, it&#039;s a different story...

It all boils down to an age old difference in philosophy between Mac OS X and Windows when it comes to font-rendering. Mac OS X uses softer, anti-aliased fonts that attempt to preserve the typeface as it was intended to be seen by the designer at the cost of some blurriness here and there. Windows tries its damndest to make the characters line up by whole-pixels with the pixel-grid to preserve clarity. This looks so awful on LCD displays (because of the more visible dot matrix) that ClearType was almost a necessity with Windows XP to force sub-pixel anti-aliasing on Windows displays. Unfortunately for designers, ClearType is only turned on by default in Internet Explorer 7 and Windows Vista. Even with ClearType, the view is not spectacular. It&#039;s not using Apple&#039;s sub-pixel rendering style, it&#039;s still hammering characters into the pixel grid, and then anti-aliasing, which usually has the effect of adding weight to the font. The end result is even more disparity between what you see on your screen and what you see  on paper. Microsoft&#039;s method aims to improve readability on-screen and Apple&#039;s method attempts to normalize the appearance of the font across all types of media.

With resolution independent vector-based GUIs on modern operating systems, Microsoft&#039;s font-hinting will be come obsolete as the average DPI of consumer displays rises. In the mean time, we&#039;re stuck with crapola font rendering for the majority of our Windows users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same headache with my site. I&#8217;m using Helvetica Neue Light for the content and Myriad Pro for the heads, both which seem to be gaining some popularity as a pre-installed Mac OS X fonts (Myriad Pro is the default typeface for most Apple logos and headings). The font virtually doesn&#8217;t exist in the Windows world, so my site falls back onto Helvetica for body text and Verdana for heading text. That configuration actually looks pretty decent on Mac OS X. On Windows, it&#8217;s a different story&#8230;</p>
<p>It all boils down to an age old difference in philosophy between Mac OS X and Windows when it comes to font-rendering. Mac OS X uses softer, anti-aliased fonts that attempt to preserve the typeface as it was intended to be seen by the designer at the cost of some blurriness here and there. Windows tries its damndest to make the characters line up by whole-pixels with the pixel-grid to preserve clarity. This looks so awful on LCD displays (because of the more visible dot matrix) that ClearType was almost a necessity with Windows XP to force sub-pixel anti-aliasing on Windows displays. Unfortunately for designers, ClearType is only turned on by default in Internet Explorer 7 and Windows Vista. Even with ClearType, the view is not spectacular. It&#8217;s not using Apple&#8217;s sub-pixel rendering style, it&#8217;s still hammering characters into the pixel grid, and then anti-aliasing, which usually has the effect of adding weight to the font. The end result is even more disparity between what you see on your screen and what you see  on paper. Microsoft&#8217;s method aims to improve readability on-screen and Apple&#8217;s method attempts to normalize the appearance of the font across all types of media.</p>
<p>With resolution independent vector-based GUIs on modern operating systems, Microsoft&#8217;s font-hinting will be come obsolete as the average DPI of consumer displays rises. In the mean time, we&#8217;re stuck with crapola font rendering for the majority of our Windows users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Site update: progress report by Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/site-update-progress-report/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=327#comment-11</guid>
		<description>WordPress is a wonderful CMS that can&#039;t be beat for simplicity and ease of use, but lacks a little in the features department. However, I&#039;ve run into several plugins that bring WordPress closer to the power of ExpressionEngine. It can be surprisingly powerful for a simple (and FREE!) CMS. For corporate installations it&#039;s hard to top ExpressionEngine, but I&#039;ve set up some sites for friends using just WordPress some some plugins, like the Filosofo Home-Page plugin, and it proved extremely dynamic and useful. In this case we wanted low cost, but still wanted some of the full-CMS functionality. We were looking for something a little simpler than Joomla! or Drupal and something that is also easy to deploy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress is a wonderful CMS that can&#8217;t be beat for simplicity and ease of use, but lacks a little in the features department. However, I&#8217;ve run into several plugins that bring WordPress closer to the power of ExpressionEngine. It can be surprisingly powerful for a simple (and FREE!) CMS. For corporate installations it&#8217;s hard to top ExpressionEngine, but I&#8217;ve set up some sites for friends using just WordPress some some plugins, like the Filosofo Home-Page plugin, and it proved extremely dynamic and useful. In this case we wanted low cost, but still wanted some of the full-CMS functionality. We were looking for something a little simpler than Joomla! or Drupal and something that is also easy to deploy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
