<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking a sacred rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/breaking-a-sacred-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/breaking-a-sacred-rule/</link>
	<description>Quit giving me that dirty look...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:44:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Noyes</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/breaking-a-sacred-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Noyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=992#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Re-sampling is the best noise filter of them all. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re-sampling is the best noise filter of them all. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Timofejew</title>
		<link>http://www.timofejew.ca/2008/breaking-a-sacred-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Timofejew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timofejew.ca/?p=992#comment-23</guid>
		<description>And just to answer a question I was asked, the photos haven&#039;t been retouched, with the exception of &quot;red-eye removal&quot; from one of the shots. They are simply as the iPhone took &#039;em; no twiddling of contrast/exposure/white balance/noise/saturation, etc. But, they been resized for the page, which, of course, makes them appear sharper than they really are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just to answer a question I was asked, the photos haven&#8217;t been retouched, with the exception of &#8220;red-eye removal&#8221; from one of the shots. They are simply as the iPhone took &#8216;em; no twiddling of contrast/exposure/white balance/noise/saturation, etc. But, they been resized for the page, which, of course, makes them appear sharper than they really are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
